[short title of solved problem and solution]

  • Status: [draft | in review | changes needed | unsuitable | withdrawn | accepted | superseded by ADR-XXXX]

  • Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision | Pocket Network Protocol Team | Pocket Network Community | Pocket Network Foundation]

  • Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated]

Table of Contents

Summary

In the context of [use case | user story u], facing [concern c], we decided for [option o] and neglected [other options], to achieve [system qualities | desired consequences], accepting [downside d | undesired consequences], because [additional rationale].

[ optional additional high-level information ]

Problem Statement

[ description of problem ]

[Background | Origin Document | Technical Story]

[description | ticket/issue URL]

Decision Drivers

  • [driver 1, e.g., a force, …]

  • [driver 2, e.g., a facing concern, …]

Considered Options

  1. [option 1]

  2. [option 2]

  3. [option 3]

Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].

Positive Consequences

  • [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]

Negative Consequences

  • [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]

Pros and Cons of the Options

[option 1]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …]

Pros:

  • [argument a]

  • [argument b]

Cons:

  • [argument c]

[option 2]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …]

Pros:

  • [argument a]

  • [argument b]

Cons:

  • [argument c]

[option 3]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …]

Pros:

  • [argument a]

  • [argument b]

Cons:

  • [argument c]

References

Last updated